Transmission network service provider (TNSP)
The regulated transmission businesses -- Transgrid, AusNet, Powerlink, ElectraNet and others -- which propose projects, run the regulatory investment test, obtain planning approval, acquire easements and build.
Responsibilities
- Apply the regulatory investment test for transmission
- Select routes and engage landholders and communities
- Obtain state planning and Commonwealth environmental approvals
- Acquire easements, by agreement or compulsorily
- Construct and operate the network
A TNSP is a proponent, like High Speed Rail Authority, and like HSRA it cannot approve its own project. Unlike HSRA it is a regulated commercial monopoly, which changes the character of every step: it is spending money it will recover from consumers, on land it will take from landholders, under a licence it did not compete for.
That is why the process around it is heavy, and any reform proposal here has to start by accepting the reason for the weight rather than treating it as oversight.
The step that has actually delayed projects, though, is none of the regulatory ones. VNI West slipped roughly two years -- from 2028 to late 2030 -- on landholder engagement and assessment. The reforms that matter most to transmission delivery are the ones that change how landholders and communities are dealt with, and those are the reforms that a database of procedural steps is worst at capturing.
Where this body appears in a process
Every point at which Transmission network service provider can hold something up, and why.
