Register as a provider of courses to overseas students
Two registrations, one regulator, two Acts, largely overlapping evidence — and since 2026 a door that is closed to new entrants entirely rather than assessed.
longest dependent chain
across 2 bodies
scheduling or queue, not assessment
vs. 935 if run end-to-end
Where the time goes
Critical-path days only. Steps that run alongside others are real work but do not lengthen the process, so counting them here would overstate the prize.
| assessment | 635d | Someone is genuinely evaluating the merits. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| applicant | 210d | Waiting on the applicant to supply or fix something. | |
| queue | 90d | Waiting behind unrelated work in a backlog. |
90 of 935 elapsed days are spent waiting for a person or a meeting rather than for a judgement to be formed. Removing that time changes no assessment standard and lowers no bar -- it is the cost of scheduling alone.
The process, step by step
Applies when: A registered education provider seeks CRICOS registration to enrol overseas students.
| # | Step | Who | Why it waits | Clock | Typical | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Provider registration with the education regulator
registration
Registration as a higher education or vocational provider, assessed against the applicable provider standards. |
Education regulators and the CRICOS register | assessment | — | 365 estimate | — |
| 2 |
Prepare for ESOS and National Code compliance
application
Written agreements, tuition protection, agent management, student support and course delivery arrangements meeting the National Code. after
Provider registration with the education regulator 390d slack
|
— | applicant | — | 180 estimate | — |
| 3 |
Apply for CRICOS registration
application
after
Prepare for ESOS and National Code compliance 360d slack
|
Education regulators and the CRICOS register | applicant | — | 30 estimate | Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) |
| 4 |
CRICOS assessment and decision
decision
Assessment against the ESOS Act and National Code by the same agency that granted domestic registration, under a different Act. after
Apply for CRICOS registration 90d slack
|
Education regulators and the CRICOS register | assessment | — | 270 estimate | Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) |
| 5 |
Receive an allocation under the national planning level
registration
The provider receives an indicative share of the national planning level, which determines how quickly its students' visas are processed.
|
Department of Home Affairs | queue | — | 90 reported | — |
on the critical path scheduling/queue = delay not caused by the assessment itself
Proposed changes
-
Supply provider fitness evidence once, to whoever needs it next
merge
~120d Three unrelated sectors, three regulators, and the same questions asked repeatedly of the same organisation: who runs it, is it solvent, is it competent, has it behaved. The judgements genuinely differ. The evidence underneath them does not.
-
Publish each provider's allocation position, since it sets their students' queue
digitise
A student's visa processing speed depends on how much of their provider's share of the national planning level remains. The student cannot see it, cannot influence it, and pays a non-refundable deposit before finding out. Publishing it saves nobody a day and changes who is in the dark.
Sources
- Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) and the National Code
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cth); National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth)
- The PIE News, 'Australia freezes new overseas student provider registrations', 2026
Something wrong here?
This page is wrong in some way -- every page like it is. If you have run
this process, the most useful thing you can do is tell us which step took
longer than we say and why. Edit
data/processes/au-cricos-provider.toml and open a pull request, or
send us the correction.
